When AI Becomes the Insider Threat: Claude and the Risk of Indirect Prompt Injections
Artificial intelligence is supposed to make our lives easier. But what happens when your AI assistant can be tricked into working against you? Recent research has shown that Anthropic’s Claude can be manipulated through indirect prompt injections to exfiltrate sensitive data — and the implications are serious for businesses relying on AI tools.
How the Attack Works
The vulnerability centers on Claude’s network access feature, which is enabled by default on certain plans. This capability is designed to let Claude interact with external resources like code repositories and Anthropic APIs. Unfortunately, it also opens the door to abuse.
Here’s the simplified attack chain:
A user uploads a malicious document into Claude for analysis.
Hidden instructions inside the file act as an indirect prompt injection payload.
Claude follows these instructions, harvesting user data and saving it into its Code Interpreter sandbox.
The payload then directs Claude to call the Anthropic File API using an attacker‑supplied API key.
Because the attacker’s key is used, the harvested file is uploaded directly to the attacker’s account.
The result? Sensitive information — including chat conversations, database credentials, API keys, and even Claude’s new “memories” feature — can be silently siphoned off.
Why This Matters
The attack is relatively straightforward and doesn’t require advanced exploitation techniques. It leverages the fact that large language models cannot reliably distinguish between benign instructions and malicious ones hidden in user‑supplied content.
Even more concerning: Claude’s “memories” feature, designed to improve user experience, can be turned against the user. Instead of helping you, those memories can be exfiltrated and exposed.
This isn’t just a theoretical risk. It highlights a broader truth: AI with network access is effectively an insider threat if not carefully monitored.
Mitigation Strategies
Anthropic’s own documentation outlines several important safeguards. Organizations using Claude should:
Disable network access if you don’t need it.
Monitor and audit Claude’s sandbox actions in real time.
Stop Claude’s actions immediately if unexpected behavior occurs.
Disable public sharing of conversations that include file artifacts.
Limit task duration and sandbox reuse to prevent looping malicious activity.
Rely on sandbox isolation to ensure environments aren’t shared between users.
Leverage Anthropic’s prompt injection classifier, which attempts to detect and block malicious instructions.
These steps won’t eliminate the risk entirely, but they significantly reduce the attack surface.
The Bigger Picture
Indirect prompt injections aren’t unique to Claude. Any AI system with network access and file execution capabilities is vulnerable to similar manipulation. As AI adoption accelerates, organizations must treat AI governance and oversight as seriously as they treat endpoint or cloud security.
Final Thoughts
Claude’s vulnerability is a reminder that speed and convenience without oversight create security debt. AI can be a powerful ally, but without the right guardrails, it can just as easily become a liability.
At Actionable Security, we help small businesses and growing organizations navigate these challenges. Our Virtual Chief AI Officer (vCAIO) advisory service is designed to give you practical, hands‑on guidance for securing AI adoption — without the jargon or generic checklists.
#TrickedByText #MemoryLeakage #ClaudeGotPlayed
